Forms

Why Chips Should Replace Checkboxes and Radio Buttons

Traditional checkboxes and radio buttons have become a thing of the past. They’re outdated and have lousy usability. Their tiny targets are hard to click with accuracy. The difference between a dot and checkmark cue can confuse non-tech-savvy users. The next evolution of checkboxes and radio buttons is chips.

Easier to Click and Tap

Radio buttons and checkboxes have small target zones without visible target borders. They’re hard for users to tap because the finger doesn’t fit inside the target zone.

Chips have a larger target zone with distinguished borders, making them easier to hit on desktop and mobile devices. The user can see the target clearer and hit it with higher accuracy.

Once users click or tap a chip, they’ll see a selection cue. A checkmark signifies multi-select behavior. A thicker outline signifies single-select behavior. The distinct style of the cues indicates different affordances.

Subscribe to read the full article

Become a paying subscriber of UX Movement Newsletter to access this article and other subscriber-only content.

Full Article  Subscribe Now


Book

Affiliate

elegant wordpress themes

This Post Has 2 Comments

  1. Brendan Reply

    A checkmark signifies multi-select behavior. A thicker outline signifies single-select behavior. – This is actually not true. It can still be multi-select even without prefixed checkmarks.

    • anthony Reply

      Technically, you can make anything multi-select with any icon you want, but that’s not the point. The point is that the interface behavior should match user expectations. Checkmarks typically indicate multi-select which is why checkboxes have them and radio buttons don’t.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *