6 Surprising Bad Practices That Hurt Dyslexic Users

by on 01/23/11 at 11:04 pm

Web accessibility doesn’t only extend to color blind users, but dyslexic users too. Dyslexia is a learning disability that impairs a person’s fluency or accuracy in being able to read, write, and spell [10]. As designers, we can help dyslexic users read text more fluently and accurately by understanding and avoiding the bad design practices that hurt dyslexic users. Seeing things from their eyes can give us a better perspective on why accessible design is so important.

When dyslexic users read text, sometimes they can experience visual distortion effects [5]. These effects vary in degree from person to person, but they can make reading text that much harder. Below are six bad practices that are likely to cause these visual distortion effects for dyslexic users. These bad practices can also make reading difficult for non-dyslexic users. But the effect they have on dyslexic users is much worse.

River effect

Dyslexic users may sometimes see the river effect in the text they’re reading [1]. This is when large gaps occur within consecutive lines of text. It can often look like a river of whitespace flowing down the page, which can make reading fluently and accurately difficult. There are a couple bad practices that make the river effect happen.

1. Justified text

When you use justified text, you’re not only making text difficult to read for non-dyslexic users, but even more so for dyslexic users. Justified text creates large uneven spaces between letters and words [8]. When these spaces line up above one another, a distracting river of whitespace prominently appears [4]. This can cause dyslexic readers to lose their place repeatedly [6]. You can avoid creating the river effect by using left aligned text, instead of justified text for your paragraphs [2].

2. Double spacing after periods

Most of us were taught to double space after periods at the end of a sentence. This practice originates from the typewriting days of the past. Because typewriters used monospaced fonts, people thought that double spacing after periods would make the end of sentences more distinct [9]. However, on the web, single spacing after periods are enough because most websites use proportionally spaced fonts. Double spacing after a period can create “rivers” within text that make it difficult for users to find the end of sentences [9]. On the web, single spacing wins.

Blur effect

Another kind of visual distortion effect that can occur among dyslexic users is the blur effect [1]. This is when dyslexic readers see their text blurring or swirling or together [5]. This can significantly affect a dyslexic user’s reading ability, and make reading very tiring for them [7]. You can lessen this effect by avoiding a couple of bad practices.

3. Pure black text on a pure white background

There’s a reason the text you’re reading now is not pure black (#000000), and the background that it’s on is not pure white (#FFFFFF). It’s because many dyslexic users are sensitive to the brightness of pure black text on a pure white background due to its high contrast. This can cause the words to swirl or blur together [3]. To avoid this, use a slightly off-white color for your background, like a light gray. You can also use a dark gray for your text instead of a pure black to cut the glare even more.

4. Long blocks of unbroken paragraphs

Long blocks of unbroken paragraphs are hard for non-dyslexic users to read, but even harder for dyslexic readers. It’s easy for dyslexic readers to lose their place with long paragraphs [1]. That’s why it’s better to use short paragraphs that express one idea [2].  This is because dyslexic users need more breaks between ideas than non-dyslexic users [6]. Breaking up your text to one idea per paragraph makes reading a lot easier for both dyslexic and non-dyslexic users.

Washout effect

Sometimes dyslexic users can experience the washout effect. When this happens, the text looks faint and indistinct [5]. This can make reading slower and cause dyslexic users to guess what a word is because of the difficulty seeing it. To lessen this effect, there are two bad practices you should avoid with your text.

5. Serif fonts

Serif fonts have hooks at the ends of the letter strokes. They may look decorative, but they can cause reading problems for dyslexic users. Serifs tend to obscure the shapes of letters, making the letters run together [1]. A sans-serif font would allow dyslexic users to see the shapes of letters more clearly because they don’t have hooks at the ends of the letter strokes. This also increases the spacing between letters, making words more distinguishable [6]. If you want your users to read your text easily, go with a san-serif font.

6. Italicized text

Italics are sometimes used to highlight text. However, the reason you shouldn’t use italicized text is because they are hard to read. The letters have a slightly jagged line compared to non-italic fonts. The letters also lean over slightly making it hard for dyslexic users to read words accurately [6]. When the text size is small, the text is practically illegible [3]. A better way to highlight is to use bold text because the letters are clearer and give better contrast.

There are many dyslexic users that suffer from badly designed websites. All of these bad practices are quick and easy to fix. It’s a matter of knowledge and understanding that will get people to change. Hopefully, this article has shed some light on how dyslexic users experience the web, and what designers can do to make their reading experience better.

[Sources

1. http://www.angelfire.com/tn3/writing/DesignUsersReadDis.pdf

2. http://clearhelper.wordpress.com/2009/12/14/web-site-design-suggestions-for-people-with-dyslexsia

3. http://www.dyslexia-parent.com/mag35.html

4. http://www.pws-ltd.com/sections/articles/2009/justified_text.html

5. http://irlen.com.sg/irlen.html

6. http://accessites.org/site/2006/11/designing-for-dyslexics-part-3-of-3

7. http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/about-dyslexia/further-information/eyes-and-dyslexia.html

8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justification_(typesetting)

9. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_spacing_at_the_end_of_sentences

10. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyslexia]

58 Responses to “6 Surprising Bad Practices That Hurt Dyslexic Users”

  1. Maurice

    Jan 24th, 2011

    #5 Is interesting i always wondered why I prefered sans serif fonts

  2. Juanlu001

    Jan 24th, 2011

    I’ve never heard that justified text was also bad for non-dyslexic users… I’ll keep an eye on that from now. Thank you very much

  3. Lambrecht Régine

    Jan 24th, 2011

    Usefull data. There is too few research about web and dyslexia.

  4. Taylor

    Jan 24th, 2011

    Thanks for this! I’m semi-dyslexic and I never even thought about it before!

  5. Matt Hill

    Jan 25th, 2011

    Regarding #2, double space after a period: HTML collapses all white space down to a single space in the rendering, so even if you pasted in a document with extra spaces, it should only display as one space in normal circumstances.

    • Christophe

      Jan 26th, 2011

      Not if you use HTML white space entity (‘ ’)

      An other option is to use ‘word-spacing’ and ‘text-indent’ CSS property to add an extra space between words and sentences

    • Matt

      Mar 3rd, 2011

      Word vigorously attempts to preserve double-spaced sentences when text is copied into WYSIWYG editors, resulting in pairs of “normal” and nonbreaking spaces between each sentence. So if your CMS or blog tool uses a WYSIWYG editor & and you write your draft in Word, it’s all too easy to double-space after periods on the web.

  6. Kate Russell

    Jan 25th, 2011

    Thanks for this. I am trying to get our users to think about all kinds of accessibility issues, but I hadn’t even considered that italics would be a problem for some. I will now!

  7. Leanne

    Jan 25th, 2011

    Interesting info. What frustrates me as a dyslexic is the absence of spell check.

    • Joe

      Jan 26th, 2011

      Most browsers nowadays have spell check. Are you saying websites should implement it as well?

      • Marcus Tucker

        Feb 3rd, 2011

        Agreed – as with text resizing controls, these are basic features that are typically needed by users on EVERY site that they visit, which is precisely why it makes no sense for each site to spend time and money implementing them in their own way.

        Instead, by using a decent browser’s native support (or via an extension) for spellchecking and text resizing, the end user can have a consistent experience across every site that they use, which includes having a custom dictionary that follows you around, and websites across the web can spend their limited time & resources on their content instead.

  8. Jonny Dyslexic

    Jan 26th, 2011

    Black websites…..They make my head spin long after I have left them.

  9. Michael Grafl

    Jan 26th, 2011

    That’s a great roundup you’ve assembled there! I suffer from neither color blindness nor dyslexia, but I’m always curious about how I can make text more legible for people who aren’t as lucky as I am. Will print this out and save it for future reference.

  10. Ed

    Jan 26th, 2011

    These tips aren’t so much tips for designing for dyslexic users as tips for designing for _any_ users. Good design for non-dyslexics is good design for dyslexics – although, possibly, the effects might be more pronounced.

    I think the diagrams here are only likely to lead to unhelpful simplification of dyslexia. Dyslexia is a cognitive problem and the diagrams might lead people to think it’s a visual problem: “What dyslexic users _see_”.

    Point 5 suggesting that serifs are problematic and decorative is probably also a simplification. Serifs can add a lot to typefaces adding emphasis to the letters shapes – the problems come when setting serif typefaces at small sizes on low resolution screen where the details of the serifs cannot be resolved. Use 16pt or larger Georgia for example and it’ll be as easy to read as any sans-serif typeface.

    In conclusion – make sure your text is designed for readers not the designer and everyone will thank you. (Oh, and the text on this site is too small!)

    • Sherry

      Apr 19th, 2012

      Yes, dyslexia is a “cognitive” or “neurological” issue, but on the flip side, I appreciate the attention being drawn to the visual side of this- “what dyslexics see.” Having 2 dyslexic children (almost all grown) we encounter people who think that learning how to read should solve all their “problems”, but these issues with text and visual perception affect their lives everyday, causing dizziness, difficulty in test taking, transposing information from one place to another- think math tests and scantron for starters.

      Thanks for drawing attention to this.

      And yes, my younger daughter says that what’s good for dyslexics is good for all of us!

    • Holly

      Nov 1st, 2012

      Ed,
      I dont think you have dyslexia, and I dont know what normal people see, but I have some thoughts about
      “Dyslexia is a cognitive problem and the diagrams might lead people to think it’s a visual problem”

      Its not a cognitive problem
      Most dyslexics are highly intelligent with good cognition
      ‘Cognitive’ is often used to describe the quality of thinking, as in ‘Altzheimers people have poor cognitive function’

      Its not a visual problem
      Most dyslexics have normal vision, in contrast with someone whose eyes have been injured so they cannot focus well on near objects.

      Its a symbol processing problem
      Most dyslexics are not aware that anything weird is happening when they read. As kids do, they think what they see is what everybody sees. However, the lucky ones who figure out a workaround for the letter reversals and the changes in letter sequence within a word must work 5 times harder than their normal classmates before they understand what the rest of the class does.

      For the dyslexic, who hasn’t a clue what normal people see, it feels like a visual problem. So you get your eyes checked and its all OK. But the problem is still there; your brain does the interpreting before you are aware of what you are looking at.

      For example, some pages are so horrible in optical effects , they cause me pain: extreme contrast effects can lead to migranes. The page may flash on and off until I have to stop before I get dizzy or sick in the stomach.

      Especially when Im tired, I will read a different word somewhat like the real one.It makes so little sense that I have to stop and re-read. When the highway exit signs start being silly, I go get coffee. Its a shock when this happens because its unpredictable. I broke out in a cold sweat after reading a sign as ‘Snakes & Burgers’ when it was really ‘Shakes & Burgers’.

      As an anology to what it feels like:
      You sit in front of a computer screen to do some work while moving strobe lights go off at random. It takes hard work to read while your eyes are pounded with intense light. It gets harder to read as your eyes get tired and harder than usual to understand the topic so you wander off for some coffee.

      I particularly despise “accessible” site that are all text, especially two column sites where something short and cryptic is in the thin left column and long lines of single spaced text run across the rest of the page. My eye doesnot follow to the next line so I read it all over. Such pages are hard to look at and almost impossible to understand. Even if I figure it out the information is hard to recall.

      When I understand something, I dont gradually build it out of doing simple steps and moving on to more advanced ones. Instead, I need to know the big picture first to make sense of the details.

      For example, math class starts out with arithmetic which has many symbols, each of which guides how the problem is solved. If you forget whether you are adding and subtract a few, or the digits change places, or 2 looks like 5, the process resembles walking through a fun house in total darkness. Doing arithmetic problems feels unnerving and unpredictable; doing the same thing gets different results, each more likely to be wrong than correct.

      I visualize to understand.
      I have been working to learn Open source programming, where documentation is text only and the content doesn’t translate easily to pictures. Its hard to learn and hard to retain compared to proprietaru software documentation which is written to gain and keep customers.

      Its so frustrating to try and fail when others seem to do just fine.

      How about a little help here for making sites understandable?

      Holly

      • Beka

        Jan 13th, 2014

        Holly,
        Being a dyslexic I totally agree with you.

        • Holly

          Jan 23rd, 2014

          Thank you, Beka

          I’m taking a Python class now and it’s become blazingly obvious that I may or may not introduce errors into the script I’m writing without the slightest idea it is happening.

          1. using IDLE, I open a new file to paste good code into and another file to use for testing code.

          ex. My code has tested as working, so I copy the code and paste it into the script window
          errors:
          1. I copy some, but not all of the lines. I find out when ‘variable xxx does not exist’ pops up
          2. Whitespace is king in python. If I add or lose a space this may introduce a syntax error
          3. I am in the testing window and I type in a line of python that errors out. I cant find the error even though I’m carefully reading through the script. I see the code, but process what I read into something familiar and wrong
          4.My quotes surround the string however they are different kinds, ‘string”
          5. each time I switch from looking at the test window to the code window, I lose my place.
          6. the harder I try, the more likely I am to overwhelm and/or make errors
          7. digits in a number appear in the the wrong position. I read 123 and copy it as 312
          8. letters in a word change position. I read head and write it as deah
          9. Visual distortions may make the screen appear to blur, twitch and become unreadable

          A fact:
          I cant add up a column of numbers the same way twice. When I found out computers could take in numbers and do perfect arithmetic, I learned to program :)
          I visualize concepts.

          Solution:
          Make the computer application check for errors so I am not chasing them down and not seeing what is wrong

          Dont switch my attention between two different windows
          Dont copy and paste line by line
          Dont stop, look things up and then have to find my place again

          Use an IDE that shows me autocompletion, allows lookups of functions etc as needed without me having to move away from the single window to some other window

          WingIDE is the only python IDE I have found -so far- that makes it practical for me to write python

  11. Ryan McGowan

    Jan 26th, 2011

    Another way to increase readability is increasing font size….I don’t know why you are using a 12px font. 15 or 16 looks much better!

  12. Chevas

    Jan 26th, 2011

    I know that font sizes can be adjusted with browser zoom, but increasing the default font size is helpful too. 12px Helvetica/Arial across 600 pixels of width is not as effective as at least 14, 16, or even 18px.

    • Chris F.A. Johnson

      Feb 9th, 2011

      The only sensible font size for body text is 100% (or 1em). This is the user’s default size, which, presumably, is set to the most readable size.

      Neither 14px or 16px is large enough for me to read comfortably.

      For other viewers, 12px may be more effective.

  13. barney

    Jan 26th, 2011

    Hi, I have understood everything this article explains, but I can’t say I agree with doing all of these things when designing a website.

    All these recommendations should be put to the companies making the web browsers for a “dyslexic mode” where these things can be turned on and off (e.g. undo justified text, italic replaced with bold, not using serif fonts, decrease font colour-background colour contrasts etc). Web browser makers can easily handle these things FOR ALL WEBSITES, not just those that understand the reasons behind it.

    Meanwhile, the web page makers just need to be aware of some of the more stylistic choices, such as avoiding long blocks of unbroken paragraphs, which is a good idea for everyone. Also webpages should generally avoid hard-coded font sizes, font names, font display properties etc and rely on the generic HTML styling that can then be overridden by a browser as per above.

  14. Tepic

    Jan 27th, 2011

    Interesting, but a few points. Technically,it is fully justified text that is difficulty (and not just for dyslexic users!). Right or left justified text should be fine.

    Serf or san-serif is an interesting one. San-serif is used in documents people do not want you to comprehend, such as contracts and small print. Serif print is easer to comprehend as a whole, so is used in documents people want you to understand. This is a very well understood and used concept that has been used for many decades after extensive research. So there is a trade-off for dyslexic readers, have text that is easier to read, or text that is easier to comprehend – not an easy decision.

  15. Mark

    Jan 27th, 2011

    You also need to pay attention to type size. So many sites make the font too small. Sorry but this includes you.

    http://www.wilsonminer.com/posts/2008/oct/20/relative-readability/

  16. Rob Mills

    Jan 27th, 2011

    This is great info, thank you. I wasn’t aware that pure black text on pure white caused problems but I will keep that in mind.

    Out of curiousity how does bold text impact dyslexic users or perhaps the default blue for hyperlinks?

    • Savannah

      Sep 24th, 2012

      I am one that is plagued with the inability to read black on white. I use the description that the “words move around” It is difficult to keep my place and I find myself squinting and reading the same sentence a few times before finally finding the next one. >.<

  17. Hugo

    Jan 27th, 2011

    I don’t agree that everything here is bad practices. Serif fonts are not necessarily harder to read than sans serif fonts (it depends which fonts you use, which size etc.) quite the contrary for long texts.

    What’s powerful about the web, is that if dyslexic users don’t like it, they can fix some things themselves! Just develop an extension for firefox that format all texts to make them easier for dyslexics, and you’re done!

  18. [...] 6 Surprising Bad Practices That Hurt Dyslexic Users – UX Movement [...]

  19. Genevieve Labadie

    Feb 7th, 2011

    Hi!

    Love “4. Long blocks of unbro­ken paragraphs”.

    I finally get why I always make small paragraphs.

  20. Gary

    Feb 7th, 2011

    I bet low contrast hurts as many people as it helps. My old eyes want as much contrast as they can get.

  21. Roxanne Ready

    Feb 7th, 2011

    Thanks much for this article. I’ve been digging around online for a while trying to cobble together the various bits of info for making sites readable for dyslexics, so I appreciate the round-up.

    There seems to be a lot of debate regarding serif or sans-serif font usage. My two cents are that while research may have shown serif fonts to be more readable for many people, dyslexics face different challenges than the “average” reader. If one of those challenges is that letters run together, then it makes perfect sense that serif fonts would be a hindrance to them. On the other hand, I also hear that dyslexia affects different people in different ways, so perhaps it’s true that for some people it’s easier and some it’s harder. Not being dyslexic myself or a scholar on the subject, I have no way of knowing.

    Another interesting consideration outside that of serif/sans-serif is whether to use so-called “infant characters” or “double story” characters. The former are letters like “a” which are written without the extra tier, just basically a circle with a line down one side, instead of the little roof on top. I would imagine using non-infant characters would make letter distinction easier for dyslexic readers — but again, I have no way of knowing if I’m right. Perhaps they add confusion instead.

    I suppose what it boils down to is the need for more well-publicized, large-scale research into this. I’m really quite amazed how up-in-the-air the whole thing is this many years into the Web.

  22. Julie Davenport

    Feb 18th, 2011

    Apart from being visually clear it is also very informative; funny how the simplest of changes can have a dramatic effect on both the dyslexic and non-dyslexic reader.

    Many Thanks.

  23. Polenth

    Feb 27th, 2011

    Though I do find black-on-white can start swimming and blurring, making the text slightly off grey or making the background light grey actually makes it worse for me. What sorts it for me is a colour tint in the background (yellow or tan is best) with black text. Using colours elsewhere on the page (headings, etc) also helps keep the text stationary.

    This is why my blog has a yellowy-tan background, and my black-on-white website has coloured headings and a coloured border around the text. I can look at both without text blurring.

    This won’t be true of all dyslexics, but I do know others who find colour tints (rather than grey-scale tints) and coloured dividers more comfortable.

  24. pbz1912

    Mar 2nd, 2011

    I’m dyslexic.

    I find smaller text much easier to read than larger text. But you do need a shorter line length.

  25. Mike

    Mar 3rd, 2011

    “There’s a rea­son the text you’re read­ing now is not pure black (#000000), and the back­ground that it’s on is not pure white (#FFFFFF).”

    Okay, I can see that and now I know what they AREN’T, but what ARE they? What are the codes for the colors you are using for the article?

    • nomadsolo

      Oct 19th, 2011

      The text color is #333333, but the background color is, in fact, #ffffff – pure white – the author missed that one.

      • anthony

        Oct 19th, 2011

        I changed the background to white and made the text lighter to balance the contrast. There’s just something about a white background that makes everything look cleaner.

  26. Alan De Smet

    Mar 13th, 2011

    Here’s a good way to improve readability for everyone: Don’t set the font size! Users can set the font size that is comfortable for them in their web browser settings. Setting a custom font size just about ensures that your text will be hard to read for many people. Sure, they can use the zoom controls to try and compensate, but it’s a crude solution and needs to be applied on every web site. Why use a crude solution when a good solution, respect the user’s font size, already exists. On that note, I found myself cursing your little fonts and the resulting eye strain.

  27. Julián

    Apr 12th, 2011

    Very interesting, thank you!

  28. Andrew

    Oct 13th, 2011

    I often get swimmy with black text on a white background, i think the line-height and text- spacing attributes tend to make things a bit better. I have to say its hard to find a happy medium when trying to get a nice color scheme that is also easy to read for people with dyslexia.

  29. Suzanne

    Oct 18th, 2011

    Just reading this website hurt my eyes. I had to block out the examples in order to understand your content. Thanks for explaining my difficulty with websites. As a web programmer I can make these changes.

  30. MicroAngelo

    Oct 19th, 2011

    Great article, and a lot of good tips – as others have said, for both dyslexic and non-dyslexic users.

    However, now that web fonts are working across pretty much all browsers it is possible to have nice non-automatically-generated italics, which avoids the problem of nasty jagged edges and illegibility… provided you choose the font wisely and remember to include the italic version of your font in your web font package.

  31. Paul

    Oct 21st, 2011

    Ok, good read, but not using a high contrasting foreground/background colour scheme is not good practice for your much more common generic user also… Your mobile app uses black on white.

    The benefits of using higher contrast if your target audience is not just the dyslexic community outweighs the negative. I’ll make sure to adhere to the rest in future practices though (only usually occasionally italicise keywords)

  32. Abby

    Nov 18th, 2011

    This is very interesting…although I had to laugh, when I clicked on the first reference link, the document titled: “Document Design for Users with Reading Disorders.” It’s ALL justified text, which is the #1 no-no listed!

    Ironic, no?

  33. Fernette Eide

    Dec 5th, 2011

    Thanks for this article. For more about the basic science of some of visual crowding issues of dyslexics, may be you’d like to see this article: http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/4/14.full

    Many of your suggestions are right on. What complicates the matter is that some dyslexics prefer serif fonts, while others prefer sans serif. Visual crowding is difficult for almost all though.

    Some of the fonts that are popular among dyslexics are Comic sans, Calibri, Times new roman – some like adjusting character spacing to reduce visual stress, and many like to change font color and background.

  34. Alison

    Dec 7th, 2011

    This is really interesting as we’ve been looking into accessibility a lot recently and through a client have even consulted with an organisation that assists partially sighted people.

    Best practices dictate that we adhere to many of your points already but some points (particularly #3) directly contradict what we’ve been told by a consultant who is partially sighted themselves.

    Accessibility means different things to different groups and finding a balance is proving to be tricky.

  35. zebbadiah

    Dec 12th, 2011

    Interesting comments. I discovered I have a form of dyslexia at 58 when I returned to Tafe to retrain myself. Then all the learning difficulties memories came flooding back. I have been self employed for nearly 40 years in building contracting and services industry. I am attempting to switch to computer systems and web design to degrade gracefully down to my retirement in about 30 years time. My issues are not visual but learning and retaining. I approach everything backwards. I visualise the end result then walk back along the track till I find what I need to make it happen. I am interest in finding a learning style and documenting it to assist others to make their journey easier. Anyone in the forum that can point me in that specific direction?
    thanks, Zeb.

  36. Finnur Forvitni

    Jan 15th, 2012

    I am currently looking to improve our website for accessibility. Appreciate your article very much.

    A really impressive website is http://www.london2012.com for the Olympics that will take place this summer. Their site has so many options that I’m envious:)

    The normal style sheet has 3 different text sizes, normal, larger and even larger. It is also possible to skip directly to the content. And by installing a piece of software there is a possibily to have the site read out. And finally there are the High Visibility Style Sheet and
    Dyslexic Style Sheet.

    And yes the Dyslexic Style Sheet has an off-white background. How black the font is, I don’t know.

  37. Andy Dalziell

    Feb 1st, 2012

    Great advice! I’d like to add that some of these visual difficulties that you have outlined can occur because the visual and vestibular information along the VOR (Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex arc) does not synchronise with the other proprioceptive information. Improving these sensory links can further reduce the stresses you have outlined. Physical intervention is one way of helping address the disintegration.

  38. ebeh

    Apr 10th, 2012

    I am dyslexic and some websites are really hard to read. I do not like it when people use double spaces after periods.

  39. Richard Salzman

    Aug 2nd, 2012

    While it may be true for some dyslexics, I take issue with number 5. (Serif fonts)– in favor of suing non-serif fonts for legibility.

    For body text, maybe in print even more then on the screen, I generally prefer the (functional) serif fonts and believe they make the individual characters easier to comprehend and the words and sentences easier to read.

  40. Marian

    Sep 27th, 2012

    I was assigned to tutor a new student in basically all of her subjects. When she arrived and i asked her to look up some vocabulary words in her book, she struggled. After several minutes she told me that she sees the lines of text in her books are all compressed. Basiciall that she cannot see any spaces between words, and the letters themselves are crammed together. While she can work hard and pick out easy words of 3-5 letters, she gets lost trying to find words of 6+ characters.

    Can anyone tell me if this Is a special type of dyslexia that I can research to find aids to help her? Is this possbily a true eye or vision problem, and not dyslexia at all?

  41. Allan Hytowitz

    Jun 18th, 2013

    We have discovered a color/contrast perception difference when used to compare the detection of a Green-on-White Dyop™ image versus an identically sized Blue-on-Black Dyop™ image.

    Individuals with dyslexia-type symptoms can preferentially see the Blue-on-Black Dyop™ rotation.

    The correlation of chromatic aberrations provides a rational explanation for dyslexia-type behavior based upon green being the predominant color for near-image focusing (i.e., reading).

    The test takes about 10 seconds to use and is free on-line at: http://www.dyop.org/documents/ColorScreening.html

    We would look your feedback as to our discovery.

    Allan Hytowitz
    Allan@Dyop.org
    678-893-0580
    ference

  42. Michael Dillehay

    Jun 23rd, 2013

    The major misconception about those of us with dyslexia is that it is a “learning disability”, it is a different information processing style. Dyslexics such as myself have a superior grasp of spatial awareness than non-dyslexics. Reading and writing rely on 2D information, moving from right to left. Dyslexics minds work more in a three dimensional way and wants to go in multiple directions at once rather than in one direction. It is NOT a learning disability, it is simply a different style of information processing that weakens one area and gives you a superior advantage in another area. When more people realise this and learn to use that information to help dyslexics rather than gelding us back, the situations that a lot of us with dyslexia go through will go a lot smoother.

    • Beka

      Jan 13th, 2014

      Michael,
      I never thought about dyslexia that way. I guess that since everyone that I’ve talked to about dyslexia always said that it was a learning disability I never gave it a second thought that maybe it could be something else. I like your way of thinking.

  43. Tanya

    Mar 16th, 2014

    As a teacher I found this information VERY helpful. I will use it to restructure how I write homework assignments and to consider when my students who have dyslexia find certain assigned texts to be frustrating to read.
    The effect of paper color was very interesting to think about and very easy to implement.

    Thank you!

  44. natalie

    Apr 2nd, 2014

    I am dyslexic, so are my three children, and lots of other family members. Unfortunately nothing of the above seems relevant to us. However double space at the end of a sentence helps keep track of where you are and also defines the end of the sentence, making text easier to follow.

Leave a Comment